Spinnaker vs Jenkins: 6 Differences, Pros/Cons & How to Choose

Article Content

What Is Spinnaker?

Spinnaker is an open-source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform developed by Netflix. It releases software changes with high velocity and confidence. Spinnaker supports deploying apps to multiple cloud providers, such as AWS, GCP, and others. It provides a visualization interface for pipelines, which offers a real-time view of deployment progress.

The platform’s integrations make it flexible, supporting various infrastructure configurations and delivery processes. Spinnaker’s built-in stages and triggers cater to complex workflows, enabling integration with a variety of DevOps tools and services.

What Is Jenkins?

Jenkins is a veteran open-source automation server extensively used in the software development process. Initially released in 2011, the primary function of Jenkins is to facilitate continuous integration (CI), allowing developers to automatically build, test, and deploy code with minimal effort. It achieves this through a plugin ecosystem that supports a wide range of tools and languages, making Jenkins adaptable for diverse development environments.

The strength of Jenkins lies in its ability to automate various phases of the build and release cycle. Developers can configure Jenkins pipelines as code, giving them programmatic control over multi-step processes. Jenkins’s community continuously contributes to its plugin repository, which includes over 2,000 plugins, enabling integration with any technology stack.

Key Differences Between Spinnaker and Jenkins

1. Purpose and Functionality

Spinnaker and Jenkins serve distinct purposes in the CI/CD realm. Spinnaker focuses on continuous delivery and deployment, offering a level of abstraction for orchestrating complex deployment workflows. Its functionality targets managing and automating release processes across multiple cloud platforms. The visual pipeline interface in Spinnaker aids in tracking and managing deployment stages.

Jenkins excels in continuous integration, automating the build, test, and integration phases. Jenkins’s primary functionality is to ensure that developers’ code can be integrated and verified. Its extensible nature through plugins supports various development tools and processes, making it adaptable for various CI tasks.

2. Deployment Capabilities

Spinnaker’s deployment capabilities include multi-cloud support and orchestration features. It supports blue/green deployments, canary, and rolling updates, allowing teams to deploy with minimal downtime and risk. Spinnaker also provides integration with cloud-native tools like Kubernetes, making it ideal for modern containerized applications.

Jenkins, while not inherently a deployment tool, can be extended for deployment through plugins for container platforms like Docker and tools like Ansible or Terraform. However, Jenkins lacks native support for advanced deployment strategies, often requiring additional configuration and oversight.

3. Integration with Cloud Providers

Spinnaker offers integration with leading cloud providers, supporting AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, and others. Its multi-cloud capability provides versatility, enabling consistent deployment strategies across diverse infrastructure environments. It allows organizations to manage resources effectively across on-premises and cloud environments.

Jenkins, while not explicitly designed for cloud environments, can integrate with cloud services through plugins. It connects to cloud resources for CI processes but doesn’t provide direct multi-cloud deployment capabilities like Spinnaker. Its usage is typically limited to CI processes rather than full cloud deployment management.

4. Pipeline Configuration and Management

In Spinnaker, pipeline configuration and management are central features. Users can define delivery pipelines using a graphical interface, incorporating stages like packaging, deployment, and verification. Spinnaker’s pipelines are configurable, allowing for integration with different tools and services. This enables control over workflows without deep scripting knowledge.

Jenkins pipelines, defined as code, offer a way to describe CI/CD processes. This setup gives teams control over pipeline logic and automation tasks, accommodating custom workflows through code syntax. While Jenkins provides detailed configuration through code, it requires expertise to manage complex processes effectively.

5. Extensibility and Plugins

Spinnaker, while not as extensible as Jenkins, focuses on providing integrations, particularly for cloud-native deployments. It supports plugins for extending its capabilities, primarily for monitoring and additional deployment stages. Spinnaker’s extensibility caters to deployment-centric use cases, enabling developers to build customized solutions within its CD framework without overhauling the core system.

Jenkins is renowned for its plugin ecosystem, allowing for customization across a broad range of functionalities. Jenkins supports over a thousand plugins, catering to various tasks like source control, build tools, and automation services. This extensibility allows Jenkins to adapt to virtually any development environment or workflow, providing the flexibility needed to integrate into existing systems. Jenkins’s open architecture makes it a popular choice where custom automation solutions are required.

6. Scalability and Performance

Spinnaker allows scalability, particularly for complex, multi-cloud deployments. Its architecture is designed to manage large-scale deployment pipelines reliably. Spinnaker’s performance is optimized for handling sophisticated delivery scenarios, scaling to match the needs of sizeable cloud-managed environments. This scalability ensures that Spinnaker can manage numerous deployment targets simultaneously, maintaining efficient delivery cycles.

Jenkins’s scalability depends on its deployment configuration and the resource allocation of its host environments. Jenkins can handle vast numbers of jobs by distributing loads across multiple nodes using Jenkins’s distributed builds feature. However, its performance in large-scale environments hinges on infrastructure optimizations, making it potentially challenging if the setup isn’t adequately tuned.

Pros and Cons of Spinnaker

Pros:

  1. Multi-cloud support: Spinnaker is designed for deployment across multiple cloud providers, such as AWS, GCP, and Azure.
  2. Advanced deployment strategies: With support for blue/green, canary, and rolling deployments, Spinnaker minimizes risk by facilitating gradual rollouts and rapid rollbacks.
  3. Visual pipeline management: Spinnaker’s graphical interface for pipeline configuration offers a way to visualize and control delivery workflows.
  4. Integration with Kubernetes and cloud-native ecosystems: Spinnaker’s native support for Kubernetes and other cloud-native tools makes it well-suited for containerized and microservices-based applications.
  5. Community and documentation: Spinnaker has an active community and documentation, which aids teams in implementation, troubleshooting, and custom development.

Cons:

  1. Complex setup and maintenance: Spinnaker’s multi-cloud capabilities and deployment options require complex setup and ongoing maintenance.
  2. Limited CI capabilities: Spinnaker focuses primarily on deployment, lacking built-in continuous integration (CI) functions.
  3. Less extensible than Jenkins: While Spinnaker supports plugins, it has fewer customization options than Jenkins. This can be restrictive for teams needing specialized pipeline configurations or integrations not natively supported by Spinnaker.
  4. Higher resource consumption: Due to its features, Spinnaker can be resource-intensive, which may increase infrastructure costs.
  5. Steeper learning curve: Spinnaker’s deployment features and interface require specialized knowledge.

Pros and Cons of Jenkins

Pros:

  1. Extensive plugin ecosystem: Jenkins offers one of the most comprehensive plugin libraries, supporting a wide variety of tools, integrations, and customizations.
  2. Mature CI capabilities: Jenkins excels in continuous integration (CI), allowing teams to automate testing, building, and integration processes.
  3. Pipeline as code: Jenkins supports pipeline configuration through code, providing control over automation steps.
  4. Scalable through distributed builds: Jenkins can distribute workloads across multiple nodes, supporting scalability in large environments.
  5. Vibrant community and documentation: Jenkins has a large, active community that contributes plugins, support, and documentation.

Cons:

  1. Limited deployment capabilities: Jenkins is not natively designed for deployment, requiring plugins or external tools to handle deployment strategies. This can complicate workflows, particularly in multi-cloud or containerized environments.
  2. Complex configuration management: Jenkins’s flexibility in pipeline as code can lead to complex configurations, requiring experienced team members to manage.
  3. Resource-intensive in large deployments: Jenkins requires careful tuning and sufficient resources to handle high workloads, especially in large-scale CI environments. Without optimized infrastructure, Jenkins can become slow and inefficient.
  4. Security risks due to plugins: While Jenkins’s plugin ecosystem is a benefit, it can also introduce security vulnerabilities, as some plugins are community-maintained and may lack regular updates or robust security practices.
  5. UI and UX limitations: Jenkins’s interface is functional but lacks the visual appeal and usability of more modern CI/CD tools.

Jenkins vs. Spinnaker: Which to Choose?

Choosing between Jenkins and Spinnaker largely depends on your organization’s specific CI/CD needs, deployment strategies, and cloud environment. Here are some considerations to help guide the decision:

Primary focus and workflow needs: 

  • If your primary goal is continuous integration, automated testing, and build management, Jenkins is a strong choice with its plugin ecosystem and CI-centric functionality.
  • For teams focused on deploying applications across multiple environments, managing cloud resources, or orchestrating release strategies, Spinnaker offers deployment capabilities suited for these tasks.

Deployment strategies:

  • Spinnaker is ideal if you require deployment strategies like blue/green, canary, and rolling updates.
  • Jenkins, while not inherently optimized for deployment, can manage simpler deployment tasks through plugins.

Cloud environment and multi-cloud needs:

  • For multi-cloud deployments or cloud-native environments (e.g., Kubernetes), Spinnaker’s direct integrations and support for various cloud providers make it a better fit.
  • Jenkins is more effective in hybrid or on-premises CI environments but requires additional plugins for connecting to cloud platforms.

Scalability and resource management:

  • Spinnaker excels in managing large-scale, multi-region deployments due to its scalability for cloud resources.
  • Jenkins also scales well with distributed builds across nodes, but resource tuning and configuration adjustments are necessary to optimize performance in large CI environments.

Team expertise and learning curve:

  • If your team has experience with CI/CD pipelines as code and can handle complex configurations, Jenkins pipelines offer customization.
  • Spinnaker’s visual pipeline management, while powerful, comes with a learning curve. Organizations must be prepared to invest time and resources in training, especially for teams new to multi-cloud delivery practices.

Integration with existing tools:

  • Jenkins’s plugin library provides flexibility to integrate with most existing tools and development stacks.
  • Spinnaker integrates well with cloud-native and container orchestration tools but has fewer options for non-cloud-focused integrations. This makes it a better choice when cloud-native support is a priority.
  • It is also possible to use Spinnaker and Jenkins together, where Jenkins takes over the CI part and Spinnaker takes over the CD part.

Codefresh: A Modern Alternative to Jenkins and Spinnaker 

You can’t get to continuous delivery or deployment without first solving continuous integration. Codefresh automatically creates a Delivery Pipeline, which is a workflow along with the events that trigger it. We’ve added a pipeline creation wizard that will create all the component configurations so you can spend less time with YAML and more time getting work done. 

At the end of the pipeline creation wizard, Codefresh commits the configuration to git and allows its built-in Argo CD instance to deploy them to Kubernetes.

The Delivery pipeline model also allows the creation of a single reusable pipeline that lets DevOps teams build once and use everywhere. Each step in a workflow operates in its own container and pod. This allows pipelines to take advantage of the distributed architecture of Kubernetes to easily scale both on the number of running workflows and within each workflow itself.

Teams that adopt Codefresh deploy more often, with greater confidence, and are able to resolve issues in production much more quickly. This is because we unlock the full potential of Argo to create a single cohesive software supply chain. For users of traditional CI/CD tooling, the fresh approach to software delivery is dramatically easier to adopt, more scalable, and much easier to manage with the unique hybrid model.

The World’s Most Modern CI/CD Platform

A next generation CI/CD platform designed for cloud-native applications, offering dynamic builds, progressive delivery, and much more.

Check It Out
Related Spinnaker articles